The CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI) LADY READING HOSPITAL, (LRH), PESHAWAR vs Syed ROIDAR SHAH, CLINICAL TECHNICIAN (PHARMACY), MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI), LADY READING HOSPITAL (LRH), — 2021 PLC(CS) 1300 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2021 PLC(CS) 1300 SUPREME-COURT
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 2021
Reporter: PLC
Parties: The CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI) LADY READING HOSPITAL, (LRH), PESHAWAR vs Syed ROIDAR SHAH, CLINICAL TECHNICIAN (PHARMACY), MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI), LADY READING HOSPITAL (LRH),

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

The CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI) LADY READING HOSPITAL, (LRH), PESHAWAR VS Syed ROIDAR SHAH, CLINICAL TECHNICIAN (PHARMACY), MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI), LADY READING HOSPITAL (LRH), PESHAWAR Deputationist, rights of---Scope---Deputationist had no right to continue in an employment as a deputationist and the employer, where the deputationist was employed, was competent to terminate the deputation and relieve the deputationist from its employment for reporting to his parent department. Citation Name: 2021 PLC(CS) 1300 SUPREME-COURTBookmark this Case The CHAIRMAN BOARD OF GOVERNORS, MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI) LADY READING HOSPITAL, (LRH), PESHAWAR VS Syed ROIDAR SHAH, CLINICAL TECHNICIAN (PHARMACY), MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTE (MTI), LADY READING HOSPITAL (LRH), PESHAWAR Ss. 16(3a) & 16(3B)---Civil servants working in Medical Teaching Institutions ('the Institutions')---Deputationists---Joint reading of Ss. 16(3a) & 16(3B) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Medical Teaching Institutions Reforms act, 2015 showed that all civil servants employed in the Institutions were deemed to be on deputation and the Board of Governors was competent to terminate the deputation period and relieve the employees from the Institutions and it was not required to give any reason for doing so---appeal was allowed.

Other judgments reported in 2021 PLC

2021 PLC(CS)N 17 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTAZMAT ULLAH VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Forestry, Environment and Wildlife, Peshawar R.10---appointment by initial…
2021 PLC(CS)N 6 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSANAULLAH VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar Regularization of services---C…
2021 PLC(CS)N 6 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSANAULLAH VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar Regularization of service---Le…
2021 PLC(CS)N 6 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSANAULLAH VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar Regln.11(5)(c)---Temporary app…
2021 PLC(CS)N 6 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSANAULLAH VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Higher Education, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar appointment---Scope---Where pr…
2021 PLC(CS)N 28 SINDH-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIARY-SERVICE-TRIBUNALALI SHAN GHORI VS HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF SINDH HIGH COURT, KARACHI R.4(1)(b)(iv)---allegation of corruption and misconduct against empl…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English