PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD KHALIQ MANDOKHAIL vs GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat Quetta R — 2021 SCMR 595 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2021 SCMR 595 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2021
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
MUHAMMAD KHALIQ MANDOKHAIL vs GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat Quetta R
Subject matter
Service

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD KHALIQ MANDOKHAIL VS GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat Quetta R. 11---alteration/correction of date of birth in service record---Rule 11 of Balochistan Civil Servants (appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 2009, interpretation of---Date of birth of the petitioner mentioned in his Secondary School Certificate was 01-03-1959, while in his service book, it was registered as 20-12-1963---Plea of petitioner that according to R. 11 of the Balochistan Civil Servants (appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 2009, (the 2009 Rules) the date of birth of a civil servant once recorded at the time of joining the government service shall be final and no alteration therein shall be permissible---Held, that service book was only a piecemeal and for all intents and purposes it would not be considered as a complete service record---Other documents relating to his service record including the academic record, the CNIC, the seniority lists prepared on different occasions, the aCRs and the retirement notification, all conjointly reflect that the date of birth of the petitioner was incorporated as 01.03.1959---Petitioner agitated his grievance in the year 2014 after a lapse of 22 years of joining service---Proceedings initiated by the petitioner seeking alteration in the date of birth while pressing in R. 11 of the Balochistan Civil Servants (appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 2009 were intended on the basis of extraneous considerations just to prolong his service period---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave was refused.

Other judgments reported in 2021 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English