PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

IMAM BAKHSH vs MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE S — 2022 CLC 81 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2022 CLC 81 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
CLC
Parties
IMAM BAKHSH vs MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE S
Provisions referred to
S. 115---R

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

IMAM BAKHSH VS MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE S.115---Revisional jurisdiction---Concurrent findings of Courts below--- Different view, possibility of---Scope---Concurrent findings of Courts below cannot be set aside on the ground that on reappraisal of evidence different view was possible---Where concurrent findings are not in accordance with law, there is glaring illegality, non-reading or misreading of evidence, then High Court can interfere in concurrent findings of the Courts--- If concurrent findings are perverse, arbitrary or fanciful the same cannot be termed as sacrosanct and can be interfered with. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English