PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD AJMAL vs PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S — 2022 CLC 965 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2022 CLC 965 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD AJMAL vs PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 114; Civil Procedure Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD AJMAL VS PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S.114 & O.XLVII, R.1---Review---Jurisdiction---Scope---Courts while reviewing judgment/order could not sit as a Court of appeal as the grounds for appeal and review were totally different from each other---Clerical, arithmetical, accidental, typographical and a pencil slip mistake which was floating on the surface of record or which apparently was against the law coverable under O.XLVII, R.1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, could be reviewed---For entertaining a review application, impugned order must suffer from any error apparent on the face of the order and permitting the order to stand will lead to failure of justice---In review, Court, in review, would not sit in appeal over its own order---Rehearing of the matter was not permissible in law---Review constituted an exception to the general rule that once a judgment was signed/pronounced, the same should not be altered---Power of review could be exercised for correction of a mistake and not to substitute a view. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English