PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD AJMAL vs PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S — 2022 CLC 965 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2022 CLC 965 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD AJMAL vs PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S
Provisions referred to
S. 114

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD AJMAL VS PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation S.114 & O.XLVII, R.1---Review of High Court judgment passed in Constitutional jurisdiction---Validity---Applicants prayed for review of the judgment to the extent of cultivation of wheat, barley contending that respondents did not place on record any kind of laboratory reports in order to show that the crops sown by the applicants were harmful/dangerous either for human being or animals---Held, that applicants failed to point out any illegality/material irregularity---All the contentions of applicants had already been duly attended in the impugned order---Number of studies/research reports issued by relevant departments of provincial government had been referred in the impugned judgment showing that sewage water was the richest source of micro/macronutrients; that the same was aimed for the better growth and productivity of plants, however heavy metals contents in vegetables and even soil would become very high which had harmful effects on human/animal health, unsuitable for agriculture purpose and sewage water also contaminated the surrounding environment---Review application was dismissed accordingly. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English