PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

PAKISTAN GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED vs SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN S — 2022 CLD 1528 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2022 CLD 1528 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
CLD
Parties
PAKISTAN GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED vs SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 33; S. 130; S. 34; Insurance Ordinance (XXXIX of 2000); Insurance Ordinance; Pakistan Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PAKISTAN GENERAL INSURANCE LIMITED VS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN S. 33(1)---Insurance Ordinance (XXXIX of 2000), S. 130 (2)---Alternate and efficacious remedy, availability of---Performance bond---Encashment---Petitioner assailed order passed by Ombudsman directing it to encash performance bond---Appeal filed by petitioner under S. 130(2) of Insurance Ordinance, 2000 was dismissed---Validity---Matter was not of insurance claim and complaint lodged by respondent was non-payment of unconditional and irrevocable performance bonds executed by petitioner---Petitioner repudiated claim of performance bonds without any lawful excuse---Performance guarantee, letter of credit and Bank guarantee were autonomous and independent contracts and the same were irrevocable in character---Petitioner did not deny execution of irrevocable and independent contracts of performance bonds---Contractors did not complete their work/job within stipulated period, even extended period more than actual/agreed time---According to performance bonds petitioner was not righteous to raise any query about terms and conditions or obligations in between the parties---Petitioner had undertaken to pay on first written demand without cavil or argument and without needing to prove or to show grounds or reasons for demand of encashment---No factual controversy was present between parties which required recording of evidence---Petitioner was not justified in repudiating claim, which was act of dishonesty and mal-administration on its part---Petitioner under the same hierarchy, also filed appeal against order in original, wherein they did not raise any objection upon jurisdiction, which had been agitated in Constitutional petition---Petitioner failed to avail alternate remedy in the form of appeal against order of SECP under S. 33(1) of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997---Ultimate appellate jurisdiction also rested with High Court under S. 34(1) of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, 1997--- Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English