HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION vs ABDUL SATTAR ANJUM S — 2022 CLD 1555 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2022 CLD 1555 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: CLD
Parties: HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION vs ABDUL SATTAR ANJUM S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 22---L; S. 5; S. 29; Limitation Act (IX of 1908); Limitation Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION VS ABDUL SATTAR ANJUM S. 22---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Ss. 5 & 29---Appeal---Limitation---Condonation of delay---Scope---Period of limitation for filing an appeal has been provided in the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, itself, thus the provision of S. 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, is not applicable in view of S. 29(2)(b) of the Limitation Act, 1908---Application for condonation of delay in filing appeal was dismissed as being not maintainable along with the appeal.

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLD

2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIMADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S. 1---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Envi…
2022 CLD 626 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHISINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY VS DIAMOND RESIDENCY through Owner/ Chief Executive Officer Ss. 17 & 1---Initial environmental examina…
2022 CLD 502 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIARIF BELGAUMI VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (SEPA) S. 17---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental…
2022 CLD 233 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIRAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH Ss. 11, 13 & 14---Prohibition o…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED S. 5(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963 [since repe…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED Ss. 6, 8(a) & 10(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English