MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice art — 2022 CLD 352 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2022 CLD 352 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: CLD
Parties: MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice art

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MIRPURKHAS SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice art. 18 & Federal Legislative List, Entry No. 58---Right to do lawful trade etc.---Federation, duty of---Principle---Duty is cast upon Federation to not only look over right to do lawful trade, etc. by creating conducive conditions but also to regulate it through legislative instrument in the interest of free competition---When a business activity traverses bounds of a Province physically and effectively, it appears to be only Federation, given its territorial expanse, competent to regulate it---along with art. 18 of the Constitution, recognizing right of an individual to lawful profession or trade, Entry 58 in Federal Legislative List covers the matters which under the Constitution are within the legislative competence of Parliament or relate to Federation---Federal Government is relevant and competent to supervise and enforce control over national economy, while Provinces to operate within their respective boundaries as a single economic unit but without discriminating between goods manufactured within its boundaries and the goods not so manufactured---Idea of free trade, commerce and intercourse throughout Pakistan, even otherwise, by its very connotation and reach is directly related to the Federation.

Other judgments reported in 2022 CLD

2022 CLD 1051 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIMADINA BREEDING (PVT.) LIMITED VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY S. 1---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Envi…
2022 CLD 626 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHISINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY VS DIAMOND RESIDENCY through Owner/ Chief Executive Officer Ss. 17 & 1---Initial environmental examina…
2022 CLD 502 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIARIF BELGAUMI VS SINDH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (SEPA) S. 17---Sindh Environmental Protection Agency (Review of Initial Environmental…
2022 CLD 233 ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION-TRIBUNAL-KARACHIRAFHAN MAIZE PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. VS DIRECTOR GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH Ss. 11, 13 & 14---Prohibition o…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED S. 5(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963 [since repe…
2022 CLD 970 SUPREME-COURTSHEZAN SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS SHEZAN BAKERS AND CONFECTIONERS (PRIVATE) LIMITED Ss. 6, 8(a) & 10(1)---Revised Trade Marks Rules, 1963…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English