IRFAN alias IMRAN alias KADU vs State S — 2022 PCrLJ 1268 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

IRFAN alias IMRAN alias KADU VS State S. 376---Rape---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Presence of the witnesses at the time and place of occurrence was doubtful---Scope---Accused was charged for committing rape with the mentally retarded daughter of the complainant---Ocular account of the occurrence had been furnished by maternal uncle and cousin of the complainant---Both the said witnesses were related inter-se, as well as to the complainant and victim---In that background, their presence at the place of occurrence at the relevant time and response shown by them on hearing the hue and cry raised by the victim, as well as their reaction to rescue the victim and catch hold of the perpetrator, when admittedly he was not armed with any firearm weapon, was of pivotal importance---Statements of the said witnesses were at variance qua their reaction on attracting to the place of occurrence and seeing the accused allegedly in naked condition---One of the witnesses claimed that they put effort to apprehend the accused, however, he fled away---Another important aspect of the case was that although both the prosecution witnesses were closely related to the victim but on reaching house of the complainant, they opted to wait for his return and didn't report the matter to the police promptly---Record did not disclose whether they had attempted to make any effort whatsoever to establish contact with the complainant through phone to inform him about such a shocking occurrence---Both the prosecution witnesses were inconsistent with regard to distance between the place of occurrence and house of the victim---All the said facts when taken conjointly created dents with regard to presence of the prosecution witnesses at the place of occurrence as claimed by them---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond shadow of doubt---Appeal was allowed and accused was acquitted by setting aside conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court, in circumstances.

IRFAN alias IMRAN alias KADU vs State S — 2022 PCrLJ 1268 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2022 PCRLJ