MUHAMMAD UMAR vs State Motive, not proved — 2022 PCrLJ 695 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

MUHAMMAD UMAR VS State Motive, not proved---Scope---Failure to prove motive is not fatal to the story of prosecution. Head NotesCase Description

2022 PCrLJN 97 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHDURO alias DUR MOHAMMAD VS State Ss. 302, 337-H(2), 114, 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, rash or negligent act to endanger human life or personal sa…
2022 PCrLJN 80 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHGUL HASSAN alias GULAN VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Recovery of weapon of offence on the pointation of accus…
2022 PCrLJN 80 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHGUL HASSAN alias GULAN VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Delay of about two days in lodging the FIR---Effect---Ac…
2022 PCrLJN 97 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHDURO alias DUR MOHAMMAD VS State Evidence---Direct evidence---Scope---If direct evidence was credible, truthful and trustworthy and was suff…
2022 PCrLJN 65 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMUHAMMAD NAWAZ VS VIII CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, HYDERABAD S. 173---Report of police officer---addition or deletion of legal prov…
2022 PCrLJN 26 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHABDUL KHALIQ VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 324, 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, rioting armed w…