PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, through Director General, F — 2022 PTD 1040 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2022 PTD 1040 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
PTD
Parties
TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI vs FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, through Director General, F
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 227---S; S. 51---P; S. 5; S. 173---C; S. 51; S. 227; Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990); Penal Code (XLV of 1860); Corruption Act (II of 1947); Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898); Sales Tax Act; Income Tax Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

TAHIR ASHRAF DURRANI VS FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, through Director General, F.I.A., Headquarter, Peshawar Morr, Islamabad S.227---Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S.51---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 409, 419, 420, 468 & 471---Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S.5(2)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 173---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition--- Quashing of proceedings---Prior approval of Federal Board of Revenue---Petitioners were serving in Federal Board of Revenue and Income Tax department---Federal Investigating Agency initiated investigations against petitioners for committing criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery and misconduct---Contention of petitioners was that under S.51 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and under S.227 of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, suit or criminal prosecution against them was barred unless a prior approval was granted in that respect by Federal Board of Revenue---Validity---Province under the petitioners related to only official acts, orders or anything done in good faith by the officials performing duty under those laws, rules, instructions or directions made or issued thereunder---Petitioners were not charged for committing contravention much the same embraced by those laws, etc. that needed an approval in advance from the Board for an action against them under some other laws--- Petitioners were alleged to have fake companies and directed tax return refunds to such companies' bogus accounts and accounts of non-existent persons with a predetermined mind and Bank officials colluding with them in the spree--- Whole episode was full of mens rea and was an outcome of proclivity to commit actus reus with plan base in approach and consequences--- Such acts and ensuing effects were nowhere defined or covered or comprehended by Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, therefore not protected under aforesaid provisions nor could such construction even otherwise be construed running under other laws---High Court declined to interfere in criminal proceedings pending against petitioners---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2022 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English