FIAZ AHMAD vs MUHAMMAD RIZWAN S — 2022 YLR 1616 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2022 YLR 1616 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2022
Reporter: YLR
Parties: FIAZ AHMAD vs MUHAMMAD RIZWAN S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 9---S

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FIAZ AHMAD VS MUHAMMAD RIZWAN S. 9---Suit for possession---Proof---Essentials---Claimant had to prove its possession; such possession must have been dispossessed; such dispossession must be from immoveable property without consent of person in possession, without due course of law; and suit was to be filed within six months of such dispossession.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

2022 YLRN 144 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMUHAMMAD KHALIQ KHAN VS State "Obligation"---Meaning.
2022 YLR 999 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAQEEL HUSSAIN VS State Witnesses---Dishonest improvements---Effect--- Improvements once found deliberate and dishonest cast serious doubt on…
2022 YLR 1193 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREMUHAMMAD JAVED VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---Even a single circumstance creating doubt in a prudent mind was sufficient, benefit t…
2022 YLRN 28 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREAMEER HUSSAIN VS State Benefit of doubt---Principle---If there was a single circumstance which created doubt regarding the prosecution case,…
2022 YLR 2210 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTSOHAIL AHMAD VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss.16, 21 & 24---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 419 & 506---…
2022 YLRN 22 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHABDUL QADIR alias ALI VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 377 & 34---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21, 2…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English