PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

ALAMDAR TAHAWAR AND NASIR (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs RENT CONTROLLER, ISLAMABAD (WEST) S — 2022 YLR 2424 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2022 YLR 2424 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2022
Reporter
YLR
Parties
ALAMDAR TAHAWAR AND NASIR (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs RENT CONTROLLER, ISLAMABAD (WEST) S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 17

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ALAMDAR TAHAWAR AND NASIR (PRIVATE) LIMITED VS RENT CONTROLLER, ISLAMABAD (WEST) S. 17 (6), (8) & (9)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 115---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition--- Future rent, non-deposit of---Relationship of landlord and tenant---Defect in title of landlord---Effect--- Petitioner / landlord was aggrieved of non-deposit of rent by respondent/tenant on his denial of relationship of landlord and tenant---Validity---Respondent could not deny that his entry into rented premises was only on the basis of rent agreement---Once a tenant was always a tenant---Such doctrine was based on the principle that once one had entered into premises as a tenant, he could not be heard to deny lessor's title---Allotment of plot in question was cancelled but respondent did not lose his status as a tenant---Such cancellation did not ipso facto bring to an end the tenancy created by rent agreement nor it created a tenancy with Capital Development Authority---No rent agreement between respondent and Capital Development Authority---No agreement as respondent was using rented premises for a commercial purpose which was not the purpose for which plot in question, in which rented premises were situated, was allotted by Capital Development Authority---Respondent was estopped by Art. 115 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 from disputing title of petitioner so long as he was in possession of rented premises---Denial of respondent of a relationship of landlord and tenant with petitioner based on his objection to title of petitioner could not have been looked into by Rent Controller---Rent Controller committed jurisdictional irregularity by holding that order for deposit of tentative rent could not be passed where there was denial of relationship of landlord and tenant---High Court directed Rent Controller to give decision on consequences of respondent's failure to show compliance with direction given to him for deposit of future rent---Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2022 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English