PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SILK BANK LIMITED vs ZAFAR MEHMOOD SHAIKH Ss — 2023 CLD 1040 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 1040 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
SILK BANK LIMITED vs ZAFAR MEHMOOD SHAIKH Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SILK BANK LIMITED VS ZAFAR MEHMOOD SHAIKH Ss. 9 & 22---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XX, Rr. 4 & 5---Suit for recovery of finance---Appreciation of evidence---Judgment---Failure to give reasons---Appellant/Bank was aggrieved of judgment and decree passed against it by Banking Court---Validity---Issues were decided by Banking Court only on the basis of affidavit-in-evidence without giving own findings and recording own reasons before deciding the two issues in affirmative---Decision on three issues, having factually admitted position, was given accordingly, as such issues did not require any deliberation/decision on the part of Banking Court---For decision on remaining issues, Banking Court either reproduced facts of case, extracts from depositions, cross-examination, or contents of letters furnished during the course of arguments---Judgment, to some extent, lacked independent decision on the issues---Though Banking Court was justified in reproducing contents of affidavit-in-evidence, cross-examination, other depositions, contents of letters, etc. and other various documents produced before it but judgment should also carry reasons for deciding issues, which aspect was lacking in the matter---Though judgment was quite elaborate in nature but the same mainly contained reproductions, and aspects of giving reasoning of eleven issues framed in the matter were wanting---Banking Court did not properly adjudicate upon the matter which needed proper decision on the issues so framed in the suit---High Court set aside judgment and decree passed against appellant/Bank and matter was remanded to Banking Court for decision afresh---High Court directed Banking Court to give independent reasonings and decision on the issues except those which were factually admitted---Appeal was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English