PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY (NHA) vs SAMBU CONSTRUCTION CO — 2023 CLD 679 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 679 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY (NHA) vs SAMBU CONSTRUCTION CO
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 115---; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY (NHA) VS SAMBU CONSTRUCTION CO. LIMITED Ss. 30, 33 & 39---Rules of Procedure for the Functions of the Disputes Review Expert, R. 9(c), (d)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115---arbitration---Revisional jurisdiction---Concurrent findings of Courts below---Petitioner authority awarded contract to respondent company---Dispute between the parties was decided by an arbitrator---Objections against award announced by arbitrator were dismissed by Trial Court as well as Lower appellate Court and award was made rule of the Court---Validity---If on reappraisal of evidence, a different view is possible, High Court cannot substitute its own view and upset findings of fact concurrently arrived at by the Courts below---Such findings can only be interfered with if the Courts below had misread the evidence or had committed a jurisdictional error--- Dispute between the parties could not be resolved without the assistance of Dispute Review Expert (DRE)---It was for such reason that respondent company referred the dispute to DRE under specific clause of the Conditions of Particular application---Just like rule 9(c) of Rules of Procedure for the Functions of the Disputes Review Expert, the provision of R. 9(d) of Rules of Procedure for the Functions of the Disputes Review Expert also does not prescribe any time limit within which a party can refer a dispute to DRE---Contractual provisions which placed a time limit on a party's right to initiate a dispute resolution process had to be strictly construed--- Reference of dispute to DRE did not offend any provision of Conditions of Particular application read with Rules and Procedures for the Functions of the Disputes Review Expert---High Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction declined to interfere in the award made rule of the Court---Revision was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English