PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN vs FAYSAL BANK LTD — 2023 CLD 928 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 CLD 928 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
CLD
Parties
MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN vs FAYSAL BANK LTD
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 27

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD SHAHID KHAN VS FAYSAL BANK LTD. Ss. 22 & 27---Suit for recovery of finance---Finality of order---Principle of past and closed transaction---Applicability---Decretal amount, amendment of---After the judgment and decree was maintained by High Court, on the application of respondent Bank, the Banking Court enhanced decretal amount---Validity---Judgment and decree passed by Banking Court under the theory of merger was merged in judgment and decree passed by High Court in exercise of appellant jurisdiction, in the earlier round of litigation and had become past and closed transaction---Respondent Bank, at its own will and whims could not assail before Banking Court, the judgment which had merged into final judgment passed by High Court, by moving a miscellaneous application---Banking Court had allowed application of respondent bank in violation of the provisions of S. 27 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Only remedy available to respondent bank was to assail judgment and decree passed by High Court by filing appeal before Supreme Court---When in an appeal/revision/writ, judgment of lower forum was reversed, varied, modified or affirmed, after recording reasons on the consideration of issues of law and/or fact, the judgment/order of the subordinate Court/forum merged into the decision of appellate Court, irrespective of the fact that such judgment had reversed, varied or affirmed the decision of subordinate Court/forum---Decision of appellate Court would be operative and capable of enforcement in such case on the principle of merger---Application for modification of decretal amount could only be moved before High Court---High Court set aside the order of Banking Court on the doctrine of merger and the same was also violative of S. 27 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English