PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR vs MUHAMMAD YOUNIS KHAN S — 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR vs MUHAMMAD YOUNIS KHAN S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 12---C; S. 100---S; S. 27; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR VS MUHAMMAD YOUNIS KHAN S. 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 100---Second appeal---Principles---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Judgments at variance---Appellants/plaintiffs sought specific performance of agreement to sell which suit was decreed in their favour---Lower Appellate Court reversed findings and set aside judgment and decree passed by Trial Court---Validity---Where judgments of Courts below were at variance and High Court was hearing second appeal, preference should be given to judgment of Lower Appellate Court---Such principle of law does not entail its universal application and is not an impregnable and invariable rule of law---Finding of Lower Appellate Court is immune from interference in second appeal if the same is supported and substantiated by logical reasoning and proper appreciation of evidence and is not result of misreading and/or non-reading of evidence---Where findings of Lower Appellate Court are at variance with that of Trial Court, the two will come in for comparison of their merits in light of the facts of the case and the reasons of which the two different and contradictory, if not opposing, findings are respectively proceeded---If judgment of Lower Appellate Court is arbitrary or capricious, it can be rejected---Lower Appellate Court had gone against the weight of available evidence in holding that execution of agreement was not proved although plaintiffs/appellants were steadfast, consistent and unwavering in their stance not only in their pleadings about execution of agreement and receipt but also in their deposition and cross-examination---On the contrary, defendants/respondents did not put any serious challenge to version of plaintiff's witnesses and had made evasive denial of execution of agreement leading to improvement of case through recording evidence beyond pleadings vacillating from one position to another without being able to substantiate either--- High Court set aside judgment and decree passed by Lower Appellate Court and restored that of Trial Court---Second appeal was allowed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR VS MUHAMMAD YOUNIS KHAN O. VI, R. 4---Pleadings---Fraud---Particulars of fraud are to be explicitly stated in pleadings. Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Mst. SHAMIM AKHTAR VS MUHAMMAD YOUNIS KHAN S. 27(b)---Specific performance of agreement to sell immovable property--- Subsequent vendee/purchaser, duty of--- Subsequent vendee/purchaser has to establish by discharging initial onus that (i) he has acquired property for due consideration and is a transferee for value and his purchase is for the price paid to vendor and not otherwise; (ii) there was no dishonesty of purpose or tainted intention to enter into the transaction while acting in good faith and (iii) he had no knowledge or notice of original sale agreement between earlier vendee and vendor at time of his transaction with the latter.

Other judgments reported in 2023 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English