PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1859 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case SUMAMA NOOR MAZHAR vs PAKISTAN MEDICAL COMMISSION (ERSTWHILE PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL) through President, Islamabad Regln — 2023 MLD 1859 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2023 MLD 1859 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1859 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case SUMAMA NOOR MAZHAR vs PAKISTAN MEDICAL COMMISSION (ERSTWHILE PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL) through President, Islamabad Regln
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2023 MLD 1859 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case SUMAMA NOOR MAZHAR VS PAKISTAN MEDICAL COMMISSION (ERSTWHILE PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL) through President, Islamabad Regln. 19-D---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Admission in medical college---Vacant seats---Change of program---Permissibility---Petitioner did not qualify on merit to get admission in MBBS Program and intended to switch her admission in BDS program---Validity---Option of getting admission under Regln. 19-D of Admission Regulations (Amended), 2020-2021, was for to those students only, who had applied in other colleges but could not get admission in college of their choice in the program, thus, were allowed to be admitted in any other college on merit in the program in which they had applied---Students were not entitled under Regln. 19-D of Admission Regulations (Amended), 2020-2021, to get admission in the program other than the one they had applied for---By creating suchlike exception, as sought by petitioner, and thereby overriding settled policy which was within the knowledge of petitioner, the entire process of admission would be disrupted and merit list which had since been finalized would be thrown into disarray for which there was no lawful justification---High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution declined to interfere in transparent policy decisions of executive, aimed at achieving best possible result in managing its affairs as High Court had very limited jurisdiction for examining such criteria---Petitioner failed to point out any illegality or legal infirmity in the orders passed by authorities---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English