PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan vs JUMLA AHLYAN BURSING MOUZA KEHCHONG (HUSSAINABAD) S — 2023 MLD 817 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Citation: 2023 MLD 817 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Year: 2023
Reporter: MLD
Parties: PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan vs JUMLA AHLYAN BURSING MOUZA KEHCHONG (HUSSAINABAD) S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 10---S; S. 10; S. 11---R

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan VS JUMLA AHLYAN BURSING MOUZA KEHCHONG (HUSSAINABAD) S. 10---Stay of suit---Scope---Where appeal of previous suit was pending for adjudication in the Appellate Court and the same had jurisdiction to grant the relief in appeal, High Court observed that in such situation it was mandatory upon the court trying the subsequent suit to stay proceedings under S. 10 of C.P.C. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 MLD 817 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtBookmark this Case PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan VS JUMLA AHLYAN BURSING MOUZA KEHCHONG (HUSSAINABAD) S. 11---Res judicata---Scope---Section 11 of C.P.C. provides that no court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between parties in a court of competent jurisdiction has been heard and finally decided---Section 11, C.P.C. does not bar the cognizance of suit but only prohibits the trial of the suit or issues. Head NotesCase Description Citation Name: 2023 MLD 817 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtBookmark this Case PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Gilgit-Baltistan VS JUMLA AHLYAN BURSING MOUZA KEHCHONG (HUSSAINABAD) O. VII, R. 11---Rejection of plaint---Scope---Plain reading of O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C., shows that under this provision a suit can be rejected where suit does not disclose a cause of action, where the relief claimed is under-valued, where relief claimed is properly valued but plaint is insufficiently stamped, or where suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by law---When the provisions of this rule are attracted, the suit cannot be dismissed but the plaint should be rejected. Head NotesCase Description

Other judgments reported in 2023 MLD

2023 MLD 226 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBAHADUR KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ANWAR S. 115---Revisional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Though scope of revisional jurisdiction is limited b…
2023 MLD 226 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBAHADUR KHAN VS MUHAMMAD ANWAR Fatwa---Proof---Fatwa cannot be relied unless its authority/ signatory is produced in Court and is subjected…
2023 MLD 1131 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKARACHI CABLE SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Information S. 30--- Cable operators---Show cause…
2023 MLD 989 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHWASEEM AKRAM VS Mst. ASMA S. 25a---Transfer of cases---Scope---applicant/defendant (husband) sought transfer of suit for maintenance from on…
2023 MLD 742 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHSANWAL alias CHARYA VS State Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Safe custody of crime empties---Scope-…
2023 MLD 1086 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANPERVAIZ VS State S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Appreciation of evidence--- Sentence, reduction in---Mitigating circumstances---No pre-mediation…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English