PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar vs Dr — 2023 PLC(CS) 794 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2023 PLC(CS) 794 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2023
Reporter
PLC
Parties
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar vs Dr
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
S. 7

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Health, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar VS Dr. LIAQAT ALI S. 7(1)--- Power of Tribunal to modify punishment imposed by the competent departmental authority---Scope---Provincial Service Tribunal reducing penalty of removal from service imposed by competent authority into that of compulsory retirement with retirement benefits considering 24 years' of service put in by the respondent---Legality---Imposition of penalty was in the domain of the competent authority, for that, the competent authority was fully empowered to impose such penalty upon its employee on finding him guilty of commission of misconduct as it considered appropriate and normally the Court did not interfere in such exercise of power by the competent authority---Conversion of penalty imposed by the competent authority would require a strong justifiable reasons beyond what was stated by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment---Court was not empowered to arbitrarily and whimsically find the penalty imposed by the competent authority to be harsh merely, on the ground that the respondent had put in 24 years' of service and was entitled to grant of retirement benefits---Quantum of punishment had to be left with the competent authority and the Court cannot without any strong reason interfere with the same---Interference in the matter of punishment would be without jurisdiction when strong reasons were not assigned to support the same---Tribunal was not justified in reducing the penalty imposed by the competent authority of removal from service on the respondent into compulsory retirement, as the same was not supportable in law---Consequently, while allowing the appeal, the impugned judgment to the extent of modifying the penalty of removal from service into compulsory retirement was set aside and the penalty of removal from service was restored.

Other judgments reported in 2023 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English