PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED vs PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director General, Karachi S — 2023 YLR 1616 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2023 YLR 1616 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2023
Reporter
YLR
Parties
TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED vs PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director General, Karachi S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 11---S; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED VS PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director General, Karachi S. 11---Specific Relief act (I of 1877), Ss. 12, 42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Suit for specific performance of agreement, declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, refusal of---Lease of land--- Procedure--- Private treaty---Scope---Plaintiff company was aggrieved of refusal of defendant authority with regard to renewal of lease of land for petrol pump---Validity---Under the erstwhile Land Lease Policy of Civil aviation authority, lease expiring after 30 years was not to be renewed by mutual consent but the premises was to be leased after open bidding albeit with a preference to previous lessee if it matched the highest bid---Said policy envisaged that lease by private treaty was restricted to airlines, aviation related training institutes and services, flying clubs, and government/semi-government agencies for official purposes---Plaintiff was not amongst such entities so as to be leased demised premises without a process of open bidding---Letter issued by Civil aviation authority valued demised premises at Rs. 65,000/- per square yard---Despite methodology provided in the Policy for fixing value of land proposed to be leased, there was nothing to show how the value of demised premises had been fixed---Purported renewal of lease was not in accord with the Land Lease Policy---Since plaintiff itself sought renewal under Land Lease Policy, it could not attribute want of knowledge of violation to the doctrine of indoor management---Where Board of Civil aviation authority did not approve renewal of lease and it was in the knowledge of plaintiff that a further lease of demised premises could only be granted in line with Land Lease Policy, the letter issued by Civil aviation authority did not constitute a contract for renewing lease of the demised premises---Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that there was a contract between the parties for renewing lease of demised premises---Plaintiff did not have a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction---application was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2023 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English