Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 107 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mst. MALALA BIBI vs INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA S — 2024 PLC(CS) 107 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 107 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 107 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mst. MALALA BIBI vs INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA S
Subject matter: Constitutional
Provisions referred to: S. 4---C

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 107 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mst. MALALA BIBI VS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Payment of benefits and death compensation---Scope---Petitioner claimed benefits under the Balochistan Civil Servants' and Employees' Benefits and Death Compensation Policy, 2020, as her husband had died during service---Validity---Policy provides a compensation package to the families of civil servants and employees who die or are injured as a result of terrorist activities, as well as death compensation approved by the Government of Balochistan to the family of a deceased civil servant---It also offers one-time financial assistance to the bereaved family of a Government of Balochistan employee who dies during service due to natural causes---Policy is prospective in nature, meaning it does not apply retrospectively---Provisions of the policy do not indicate that it has been given a retrospective effect---Petitioner's husband passed away on June 2, 2020, while the policy was promulgated on August 11, 2020---Since the policy was not in effect when the petitioner's husband died, it cannot be applied retrospectively to cover cases of individuals who died prior to August 11, 2020---As no right had accrued to the petitioner at the time of her husband's death, she was not an 'aggrieved person' under Art. 199(1)(a)(i) of the Constitution---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English