MASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER vs SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Order of Services Tribunal to deposit security fee, non-compliance of — 2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: MASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER vs SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Order of Services Tribunal to deposit security fee, non-compliance of
Subject matter: Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Order of Services Tribunal to deposit security fee, non-compliance of---Effect---Dismissal of appeal---Appellants assailed order passed by the Services Tribunal whereby their appeal was dismissed for non-deposit of security fee---Validity---Appellants were directed to deposit security fee within a period of one week from first date of hearing---Till the next date, the appellants failed to deposit the security fee, where upon the Member Service Tribunal passed the order of depositing the fee on the same date and adjourned the case for the very next day---However, on next date of hearing i.e. on next day no body appeared on behalf of the appellants, whereupon the Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of its orders---Fee depositing order was passed on initial date in presence of the Advocate, representing the appellants, whereby the appeal of the appellants was admitted for regular hearing and the appellants were directed to deposit the security fees at the concerned circuit while on the next date, the clerk of the counsel for the appellants was present before the Court, who was directed to deposit the security fee on the same day, but he failed to do so and on next date i.e. very next day, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants---Thus, the Service Tribunal had no option except to dismiss the appeal due to non-compliance of its previous orders---Appellants had failed to furnish any plausible reason for not depositing the security fee, despite clear orders of the Service Tribunal---Appeal, having no force, was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…
2024 PLC 278 SUPREME-COURTSAKHIB ZAR VS K-ELECTRIC LIMITED arbitrary relief---Court, jurisdiction of---Scope---No Court has any jurisdiction to grant arbitrary relief…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English