PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1114 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case SYED FAIZAN E RASOOL vs LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S — 2024 PLC(CS) 1114 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Case information

Citation
2024 PLC(CS) 1114 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL
Year
2024
Reporter
PLC
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1114 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case SYED FAIZAN E RASOOL vs LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
S. 5---

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1114 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case SYED FAIZAN E RASOOL VS LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S.5---appeal before the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal---Master of Laws from a foreign University---Judicial officer, entitlement of---authority, discretion of---Judicial officer preferred appeal against declining of permission to apply for a Master's Degree in Law from a foreign university---Held, that grant of permission to apply for higher education, and that too from a foreign university, is not a rule of thumb for every judicial officer and the same is also not backed by any express provisions of law or rules or policy instructions or prevalent practice---Matter-in-hand pertained to discretion of the authority which was to be exercised in the light of attending facts and circumstances of each case, saddled with certain requirements / qualifications---In the present case, the authority was not persuaded to exercise discretion for a number of reasons---authority cannot be compelled to exercise the same in each and every case, especially when there is scarcity of Judicial Officers as compared to bulk of pending cases and in view of the prevalent policy of the authority---In matters of grant of leave, such discretion cannot be claimed as of right, but for seeking such relief the applicant must follow the proper procedure provided under the rules and he is not supposed to avail any kind of leave entirely in his discretion and choice in departure of the rules and service discipline---Leave cannot be claimed as a matter of right---Under exigent circumstances, the leave sanctioning authority has the discretion to refuse, postpone, curtail or revoke leave of any description and/or to recall to duty any employee on leave---No grounds for interference in the impugned order by the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal were made out---appeal filed by judicial officer, being merit-less, was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English