Raja SOHAIL ARSHAD vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Right Wing, Islamabad S — 2024 PLC(CS) 1246 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 1246 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Raja SOHAIL ARSHAD vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Right Wing, Islamabad S
Subject matter: Service
Provisions referred to: S. 11---N; S. 11; National Counter Terrorism Authority Act; NACTA Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Raja SOHAIL ARSHAD VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment, Right Wing, Islamabad S. 11---National Counter Terrorism Authority---Service regulations , prescribing of---Scope---National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) was established as an autonomous body pursuant to the provisions of the National Counter Terrorism Authority Act, 2013 ('the Act, 2013')---Section 11(1) of the Act, 2013 provides that NACTA may, from time to time appoint, either through direct recruitment or through deputation, such officials, experts or consultants as it may consider necessary for the performance of functions in the prescribed manner---Section 11(2) of the Act, 2013 provides that NACTA shall prescribe service regulations, with the approval of the Board, for the appointment, promotion and transfer of officers, staff, experts and consultants, their terms and conditions of service, including, additional financial incentives such as special salaries, allowances, pension or gratuity etc., constitution and management of pension and gratuity and shall be competent to take disciplinary action against them---Communication of Establishment Division views/comments to the draft service regulations sent by NACTA to the said Division for vetting did not mean that the said regulations had been made in accordance with S. 11(2) of NACTA Act, 2013---High Court directed NACTA to make service regulations strictly in accordance with the requirements of S.11(2) of the NACTA Act and submit a report in said regard---Constitutional petition, being merit-less, was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English