PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1362 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL GHAFOOR KAKAR vs Honorable BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT S — 2024 PLC(CS) 1362 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 PLC(CS) 1362 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PLC
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1362 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL GHAFOOR KAKAR vs Honorable BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT S
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
S. 5---J

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 1362 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case ABDUL GHAFOOR KAKAR VS Honorable BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT S.5---Judicial Officer relieved from Judicial Service of one province placed at disposal of Judicial Service of Islamabad Capital Territory---Ante-dated promotions, entitlement to---Scope---Judicial Officer who earlier served in Balochistan Subordinate Judiciary, was presently posted at Islamabad under Islamabad High Court---Judicial Officer (Additional District and Sessions Judge) was denied ante-dated promotion, when he was Judicial Officer on the payroll of Balochistan High Court (BHC)----Plea of Appellant Judicial Officer was that he was entitled to the such ante-dated promotions in the light of the judgment of the Balochistan High Court / Balochistan Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal (SJT) dated 25th April 2016 reported as PLD 2016 Bal. 56 ('judgment-in-question')---Validity---Even if the stance of the appellant was accepted, and his case was ordered to be placed before the Administrative Committee and Promotion Committee, even then his case could not be considered, as the promotion of an office is made on the basis of one's Performance Evaluation Report (PER) or Annual Confidential Report (ACR), and observing his judicial work, but in the case in hand after his appointment in the IHC, neither his PER/ACR since 2011 was available on record nor he had performed as Judicial Officer in the province of Balochistan---It was also the verdict of judgment-in-question, that the cases of the Judicial Officers be referred to the Administrative Committee and on referring the same, the Administrative and Promotion Committees decided the cases on the basis of their performance report and judicial work---Appellant had failed to make out a case in his favour---Appeal, filed by judicial officer, being merit-less, was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English