PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AHMAD MUKHTAR vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Ss — 2024 PLC(CS) 376 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2024 PLC(CS) 376 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PLC
Parties
AHMAD MUKHTAR vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Ss
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
Pakistan Engineering Council Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AHMAD MUKHTAR VS GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Ss. 2(xxiii) & 2(xxv)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Punjab Communication and Works Department (Engineering Posts Qualification and Conditions Recruitment) Rules, 1985, [as amended vide Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021]---Post of Executive Engineer in Communication and Works Department---Entitlement for promotion---Criteria---Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021 ('the Notification'), vires of---Constitutional petition challenging the Notification---Maintainability---Petitioners (Sub-Divisional Officers) professional / registered engineers having qualified from accredited universities, who expected to be promoted to the next higher post of Executive Engineer, challenged the Notification---Official Respondents (Government / Department raised objection regarding Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court regarding subject matter---Held, that objection regarding constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court was misconceived as the High court could pass order on the subject matter---Thus, constitutional petition, in the present case, was maintainable---High Court set aside the impugned Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021 for being without lawful authority---Constitutional petition filed by Sub-Divisional Officers (professional / registered engineers), was allowed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 376 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE AHMAD MUKHTAR VS GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Ss. 2(xxiii) & 2(xxv)---Punjab Communication and Works Department (Engineering Posts Qualification and Conditions Recruitment) Rules, 1985 [as amended vide Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021]---Post of Executive Engineer in Communication and Works Department---Entitlement for promotion ---Criteria---Qualification---Whether degree obtained from accredited universities or degrees of B.Tech (Hons) or BS Engineering Technology---Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021 vires of---Petitioners (Sub-Divisional Officers) having qualification of professional / registered engineers obtained from accredited universities, who expected to be promoted to the next higher post of Executive Engineer, challenged the Notification---Contention of the petitioners was that by amendments made in the Punjab Communication and Works Department (Engineering Posts Qualification and Conditions Recruitment) Rules, 1985 ('the Rules 1985') 5% quota to the post of Executive Engineer was reserved for Sub-Divisional Officers (Assistant Engineers/Directors) holding B.Tech (Hons) or BS Engineering Technology ,thus diluting the earlier 100% seats reserved for the petitioners under the Rules --- Validity ---Record revealed that, regarding present issue, a meeting of Qualification Equivalence Determination Committee (QEDC) had taken place ,having participants from all stake-holders; minutes of which (meeting) revealed that the meeting, inter alia, unanimously held that the degree of B.Tecch (Hons) was not similar to B.E./BSc Engineering and could not be equated with the same as the contents of both the degrees were altogether different ---Post of Executive Engineer could only be filled up by persons who had a degree in Engineering in the requisite discipline from a recognized University and equivalent qualification and was registered as a professional engineer with Pakistan Engineering Council (PEC) ----Thus, the Official Respondents (Government/Department) had no authority to change the criteria for granting a right of promotion to persons who did not qualify the same in terms of Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975---Official respondents could not dispute that only a professional engineer , having the requisite qualification, could be promoted to the post of Executive Engineer---High Court set aside the impugned Notification No. SOR-III(S&GAD)1-11/2020(A) dated 04-09-2021 for being without lawful authority---Constitutional petition filed by Sub Divisional Officers (professional / registered engineers), was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English