PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

INAYATULLAH LASHARI vs COMMISSIONER LARKANA S — 2024 PLC(CS) 460 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2024 PLC(CS) 460 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PLC
Parties
INAYATULLAH LASHARI vs COMMISSIONER LARKANA S
Provisions referred to
S. 3---D

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

INAYATULLAH LASHARI VS COMMISSIONER LARKANA S.3---Daily wagers---Regularization in service---Scope---Since the petitioners were employed by the Local Government as daily-wagers, and their service had been discontinued, it was not their case that they were entitled to regularization under the provisions of the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Not disputed by petitioners that as daily-wagers and contingent staff, their appointment was on the condition that their service could be discontinued at any time and that they would not qualify for regular appointment---Fact that they were re-engaged from time to time also showed that they were never in continuous service---Sole ground taken by petitioners for regularization was that they were entitled to the same treatment as other employee, who had been regularized pursuant to judgment passed by the High Court---Long and satisfactory service was no ground for regularization and an employee engaged as ad-hoc or under a time-bound contract had no vested right to regularization---Continuity in service was a pre-condition to seek regularization---While exercising constitutional jurisdiction the Court could not revive or renew expired contracts or alter the terms and conditions of an employee's contract---Petitions were dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English