Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 620 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case ALI ASHTAR NAQVI vs LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE Ss — 2024 PLC(CS) 620 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 620 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 620 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case ALI ASHTAR NAQVI vs LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE Ss
Subject matter: Service
Provisions referred to: S. 21---J; S. 21; S. 5; Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974); Punjab Civil Servants Act; Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 620 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case ALI ASHTAR NAQVI VS LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE Ss. 5(a) & 6 (1)---Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S. 21---Judicial Officer---Imposition of major penalty, assailing of---Limitation---Appeal, right of---In terms of S.21 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, right of appeal or representation is available to a Judicial Officer in respect of any order relating to terms and conditions of service, which is to be moved within sixty days of communication of such order to him---Appellant preferred departmental appeal after more than two years and two months of acceptance of his resignation , which was clearly beyond the prescribed period of limitation---When departmental appeal or representation is barred by time even if the appeal before the Service Tribunal is filed within time it would be hit by limitation---In terms of S.5(a) of the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act, 1991, where an appeal, review or representation to a departmental authority is provided under the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 , or any rules against any such orders, no appeal shall lie to the Tribunal unless the aggrieved person has preferred an appeal or application for review or representation to such departmental authority and a period of ninety days has elapsed from the date on which such appeal, application, or representation is so preferred---On account of time barred representation/departmental appeal, the present appeal against the order of rejection of appellant's representation though apparently seemed to be in time but actually it was barred by time---Appeal filed by the ex-Judicial Officer was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English