Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S — 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S
Subject matter: Service
Provisions referred to: S. 12; Punjab Civil Servants Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II VS The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S. 12, Explanation---Punjab Judicial Service Rules, 1994, Rr. 3 & 4---Punjab Judicial Service---Retirement order, passing of---Competent Authority---Scope---Argument of appellants, Judicial Officers who were retired from service by the High Court, was that competent authority for civil servants in Grade-19 and above, in terms of Explanation to S.12 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, was the Chief Minister, thus impugned retirement order had been passed by an incompetent authority---Validity---Argument of the appellants was totally misconceived as the Punjab Judicial Service Rules, 1994 ('the Rules, 1994'), regulate recruitment of the Punjab Judicial Service and prescribe conditions of service---Rule 3 of the Rules, 1994 provides that the service shall comprise the post of:- a) District and Sessions Judges; b) Additional District and Sessions Judges; c) Civil Judges-cum-Judicial Magistrates---Rule 4 of the Rules 1994 provides that appointments to the service shall be made by the High Court---Admittedly, appellants were appointed by the High Court, thus the competent authority to pass their retirement order in terms of S. 12 of the Act of 1974 was the High Court, which was comprised of the Chief Justice and Judges---Appeals filed by the retired Judicial Officers were dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English