PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE R — 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Case information

Citation
2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL
Year
2024
Reporter
PLC
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE R
Subject matter
Service
Provisions referred to
S. 12---R; S. 12; Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974); Punjab Civil Servants Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II VS The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE R. 2.1---Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S. 12---Retirement from service---Scope---Argument of appellant (retired Judicial Officer) was that he had not secured twenty years of service and infact his judicial service was 16 years, 04 months 21 days, therefore, his retirement within contemplation of S. 12 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, could not have been made---Validity---Before entering into judicial service, the appellant had more than seven years' service at his credit in Federal Investigation Agency (F.I.A.), therefore, as per Rule 2.1 of the Punjab Civil Services Pension Rules, 1955, the said period of service shall be added into twenty years of qualifying service for pension as contemplated under S. 12(i) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English