Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S — 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II vs The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S
Subject matter: Service
Provisions referred to: S. 12---R; S. 12; Punjab Civil Servants Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PLC(CS) 773 PUNJAB-SUBORDINATE-JUDICIAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNALBookmark this Case Mian SHAHID MEHMOOD-II VS The REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE S. 12---Retirement from service---Pre-requisites, observance of---Appellants /Ex-Judicial Officers assailed vires of the show-cause notices and subsequent notification issued by the respondent / Registrar, High Court, whereby they were retired from service in terms of S. 12 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974---Validity---In the present cases, proper show cause notices with reference to applicable provisions of law with full detail of allegations, pending complaints and remarks in PERs, were served upon the appellants to which they furnished their respective written replies---Element of public interest had also been rightly evaluated by the competent authority keeping in view the service record of appellants and nothing contrary had been presented before the Tribunal---Order of retirement had been passed after due process of law and fulfilling the pre-requisites to invoke S. 12 of the Act, 1974---Record revealed that all the appellants had completed the requisite twenty years' service---Ordinarily, Tribunal or Court is not supposed to substitute reasons for public interest and order under S. 12 is not interfered with as satisfaction of the competent authority regarding efficiency and performance of an employee is not to be substituted by the Court or Tribunal with its own opinion on the basis of analysis of the record---Justifiability of S.12 is restricted to the fulfillment of necessary conditions contained therein---Appeals were dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English