REHMAT KARIM vs GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan S

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

REHMAT KARIM VS GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan S.5---Regularization of service of contigent employee---Post of Motor vehicle Examiner /MVE (BPS-14)---Record revealed that the petitioner was initially appointed by the respondents as contingent paid staff for a period of six months in the year 2017 (about five years ago) at monthly fixed pay vide an order duly issued by Excise and Taxation Officer (Admin)---Contingent service of the petitioner had been extended from time to time---Hence, service status of the petitioner as contingent paid staff was not controversial and was admitted by the respondents---In an official letter addressed to Deputy Director Excise and Taxation Department, the concerned district Excise and Taxation Officer (ETO) had highly recommended the petitioner for regularization of his service against the vacant post of MVE (BPS-14) as he was fulfilling the criteria as required for the said post---Said ETO had also added that the petitioner was working as MVE for the last six months and he had acquired ample experience in matters related to physical examination of vehicles---Moreover, the Deputy Commissioner in his letter addressed to the respondent (Secretary Excise and Taxation), had also requested the said respondent to provide employment to the petitioner being most deserving and poor person on the ground that he had provided land for the construction of Excise and Taxation Office ---Furthermore, the post of MVE (BPS-14) was still vacant in relevant ETO, hence, the regularization case of the petitioner needed consideration by the respondents under the relevant provisions of the Gilgit-Baltistan Employees (Regularization of Services) Act, 2020---Chief Court referred the matter of the petitioner to the relevant Regularization Committee to consider his case in the light of recommendations of ETO---Writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

REHMAT KARIM vs GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan S — 2024 PLC(CS) 96 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC