PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD BARJEES TAHIR vs ARSLAN ASWAD NAEEM Ss — 2025 CLC 1135 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 1135 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD BARJEES TAHIR vs ARSLAN ASWAD NAEEM Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 145; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908); Elections Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD BARJEES TAHIR VS ARSLAN ASWAD NAEEM Ss.144 & 145---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VI, R. 15---Eelection petition, verification of---Affidavit---Procedural compliance mandatory---The petitioner challenged election of returned candidate from NA-111 Nankana Sahib-I---Petition was neither signed by the petitioner nor properly verified in accordance with law---Affidavit bore inconsistent dates and lacked proper identification of the petitioner---Particulars of counsel---The verification failed to distinguish between facts based on personal knowledge and belief---Even a short affidavit is sufficient if it duly fulfills the requirement of O. VI, R. 15, C.P.C.---It is settled law that when the election petitioner is not personally known to the oath commissioner, he can be identified by an advocate, who is then required to state that election petitioner is personally known to him but when the name of the advocate identifying the deponent is not mentioned on the verification, the same is not valid ---Perusal of verification on the affidavit reflected that the election petitioner declared that he verified his affidavit without specifying which paragraphs he is verifying from his personal knowledge and which paragraphs were correct to his belief---There was a stamp of oath commissioner which reflected a different date of oath---When identification was to be made by an advocate, his name and particulars were required to be mentioned---When the affidavit fulfills requirement of O. VI, R. 15 of the C.P.C. then even a short affidavit is sufficient---Election petition should be properly verified by the petitioner, specifying which facts are based on personal knowledge and which are based on belief---The Tribunal found that the petitioner's affidavit lacked proper verification, with inconsistencies in dates and missing signatures---Tribunal under S. 145(1) of the Elections Act, 2017, dismissed the petition, citing multiple procedural violations.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English