PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SHABANA PARVEEN vs Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance — 2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
SHABANA PARVEEN vs Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or mandatory---Principle---'May' and 'shall' are interchangeable and their interpretation as to whether they are directory or mandatory in nature depends upon the context in which they are used and cannot be interpreted with the rigidity attributed to them in ordinary parlance---If no penal consequences are given in a provision, even if the word "shall" is used therein, the said provision becomes directory (and not mandatory) and the word "shall" will be read as "may".

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English