PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

AFZAAL AHMED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Interior, Islamabad art — 2025 CLC 1389 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 1389 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
AFZAAL AHMED vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Interior, Islamabad art
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

AFZAAL AHMED VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary of Interior, Islamabad art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Disputed questions of facts---No writ where disputed facts require evidentiary inquiry---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court not a shortcut to bypass statutory mechanisms---Constitutional courts not fact-finding tribunals---Extraordinary jurisdiction cannot supplant statutory mechanisms---Writ jurisdiction, being discretionary and extraordinary in nature, could not be invoked to supplant statutory mechanisms designed for the resolution of factual disputes requiring the examination of evidence---Thus, the discretionary exercise of writ jurisdiction must remain an exception rather than the rule, reserved only for cases where no equally effective alternative exists---Superior courts must refrain from adjudicating disputed questions of fact that necessitate evidentiary inquiry---This principle, firmly entrenched in judicial discipline, ensures that constitutional courts exercising extraordinary jurisdiction do not assume the role of fact-finding tribunals---The rationale underlying this restraint was put in place to preserve the integrity of specialized statutory forums vested with the competence to examine factual controversies through proper evidentiary procedures.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English