ZULFIQAR ALI vs Mirza ALTAF HUSSAIN Ss — 2025 CLC 1870 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLC 1870 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLC
Parties: ZULFIQAR ALI vs Mirza ALTAF HUSSAIN Ss
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 115---C; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

ZULFIQAR ALI VS Mirza ALTAF HUSSAIN Ss.3 & 5---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 115---Civil revision---Limitation---Civil revisions were filed within time, however, office objections were not removed within the specified time---Effect---Time consumed in removing the office objections, exclusion of---Applications filed for condoning the delay---Plea of misplacing the files of the cases due to shifting of office by the counsel---Validity---In cases in which certain objections are raised by the office, which render the institution of case in itself invalid or incompetent should be held to be time barred unless the objections or deficiencies indicated by the office are met within the time specified by the office---At the bottom of objection-sheets, received by the petitioner, it was clearly stipulated that the objections were to be removed within three (3) days, however, the petitioner despite receiving the files remained unable to return the same after removing the objections within the given time period---In the applications for condonation of delay it was stated that the counsel was shifting his office, whereas, in the course of argument the said counsel attributed the delay to some fellow advocate---In the entire applications no dates of shifting the office or when the files were traced were given---Delay in re-filing the civil revisions was about fourteen months, thus, such a plea was repelled being implausible and unbelievable that the file could not be located in such a long period---Civil revisions were dismissed in limine, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

2025 CLC 236 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN. Ss. 39, 42 and 54 - Balochistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 - Suit for cancella…
2025 CLC 297 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALAM VS Malik ZAHOOR AHMED. Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 35a & 115---Suit for declaration and injunction-…
2025 CLC 276 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANALI AKBAR VS Mst. NASEEM. S. 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance of minors---Father, responsibility of---Scope---Definition of maintenance, whi…
2025 CLC 253 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDAD MUHAMMAD VS NATIONAL DATABASE and REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Director General NADRA Provincial Headquarter Zarghoon Road, Quetta. Ss…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Ss. 2(l) & 24---Eviction application---Relationship of landlord and tenant, denial of---Order…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or ma…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English