PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

HAROON FAROOQ vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB art — 2025 CLC 280 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 280 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
HAROON FAROOQ vs GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

HAROON FAROOQ VS GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB art.199(1)(a)(i) & (ii)---Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Climate justice----Writ of mandamus for enforcement of climate justice---Judicial review---Scope---Elimination of climate chaos and enforcement of climate justice by the Water and Environment Commission appointed by High Court to compel implementation of actions taken for water reservation and environmental issues in Punjab particularly in Lahore---High Court exercised its ssupervisory jurisdiction with strong commitment of environmental protection and sustainable development by way of proactive measures and enforcement of strict regulations---Substantial and practical steps had been taken to control air pollution and to preserve groundwater---During the winter season those steps largely contributed to lowering air Quality Index at different places in Lahore and thereby smog was controlled which had initially assumed dangerous proportions---This was an illustration of judicial review in action, and enforcement of climate justice---These actions were beyond mere judgments which adorn law journals and fail to address in actual terms, the climate chaos, which surrounds the inhabitants---In essence, it was a case of continuing mandamus or supervisory jurisdiction where orders of High Court were enforced by a Commission set up to compel implementation---Departments in turn, came back with reports of compliance and further orders were issued for complete climate justice and to protect fundamental rights of persons---Unique tool was employed by High Court which had yielded substantial results and same would not have been possible without the selfless and untiring efforts of the members of the Commission, who had devoted their energies to the monumental task---Counsel of different Departments and Regulatory authorities had also come on board as friends of the Court and environment to lend a hand in the enterprise---Constitutional petition was adjourned for further proceedings, accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English