PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mir ABDUL QAYOOM vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM Ss — 2025 CLC 290 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 290 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
Mir ABDUL QAYOOM vs MUHAMMAD ASLAM Ss
Subject matter
Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mir ABDUL QAYOOM VS MUHAMMAD ASLAM Ss. 42 & 54---Property, identification of---Describing land with reference to boundaries---Significance---Dispute between the parties was with regard to ownership and possession of plot in question when both the parties had referred to two different numbers of one plot in registered documents in their favour---Suit filed by respondent/plaintiff was concurrently decreed in his favour---Validity---In Schedule to lease deed, plot number mentioned was 74/C, with specific boundaries---Describing land with reference to boundaries was significant because it provided a clear and specific identification of the property, as the boundaries serve as physical markers that define the extent and limits of a particular piece of land---Mentioning boundaries in legal document such as a lease helps to avoid ambiguity and ensures that there is no confusion or dispute regarding exact location and extent of the property---Such information provides a precise and objective way to identify and distinguish one property from another and is crucial for determining ownership, resolving boundary disputes, and establishing rights and responsibilities related to the land---Appellant/defendant was unable to demonstrate any misreading/non-reading of evidence or perversity in the findings of fora below falling within the scope of a Second Appeal---High Court declined to interfere in concurrent findings passed by two Courts below as the same were reasonable and sustainable one on the basis of the evidence on record---Second Appeal was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English