PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

FARHAT RASHID vs SABA FARHAT RASHID S — 2025 CLC 54 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 54 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
FARHAT RASHID vs SABA FARHAT RASHID S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 3---C; S. 3; Law Reforms Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FARHAT RASHID VS SABA FARHAT RASHID S.3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Jurisdiction of the Court---Whether Single Judge of High Court had erred in assuming jurisdiction---In respect of some past/future maintenance allowance, a direct Constitutional Petition was filed by the wife and children before the High Court ; despite office objections, High Court on the assumption of jurisdiction, passed an order directing appellant to deposit a certain amount---Appellant, being respondent in the constitutional petition in which impugned order was passed, filed intra-court appeal under S.3 of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972---Plea of the appellant was that under wrong assumption of jurisdiction, impugned order was passed---Validity---Reliance of appellant to prefer appeal under S.3 of Ordinance, 1972 read with Art. 199, Cls. (1) of the Constitution was misconceived---In the first instance, the impugned order, admittedly, did not arise out of frame of Cl. (1) of Art. 199 of the Constitution; this would not only exclude the appellant from preferring an appeal but Cl. (3) of Art. 199 was also directly applied in the sense that it was only an ad interim order---No such appeal could be filed within the frame of S. 3 of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, read with Art. 199 of the Constitution as the causes arising out of Cl.(1) of Art. 199 were primarily dealt with by Division Bench of the High Court as against rest of the other jurisdictions---Appellant may well address it under the principle of Kompetence-Kompetence and the Single Judge at best shall decide the issue of maintainability first before proceeding further in any manner --- Division Bench of the High Court remanded the case to the Single Judge who shall hear the counsel preferably on the maintainability issue first and shall then, if so required, proceed further as far as merits were concerned---Appeal stood disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English