PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Sher Muhammad vs Karam Hussain S — 2025 MLD 1144 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 1144 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Sher Muhammad vs Karam Hussain S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 115

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Sher Muhammad VS Karam Hussain S. 115 --- Revisional powers of the High Court --- Scope ---In the present case , the District Court, while passing the impugned judgment and decree, had not properly perused the record of the case viz. material aspects of the pleadings and evidence placed on file appeared to have been overlooked, resulting in an erroneous appreciation of facts and law --- A judicial determination must rest on a thorough consideration of the record, which, in the present case, was conspicuously absent --- The impugned order reflected a mechanical approach and lacked the application of judicial mind on crucial issues germane to the dispute --- Even testimony of the plaintiffs' witnesses revealed that they had, in unequivocal terms, admitted the stance of the petitioner/defendant regarding installation of pipe for the disposal of wastage water of the house of the respondent/plaintiff --- District Court had misread certain crucial pieces of evidence that went to the root of the matter and such misreading and non-reading of material evidence had led to an erroneous appreciation of facts and consequently, a miscarriage of justice, which could be corrected by exercising visitorial powers --- Claim of the respondent / plaintiff had already been dismissed by the Trial Court , admitting the claim of the petitioner / defendant qua settlement of expenses for installation of pipe established through evidence which had been overlooked by the Courts below---Application of the petitioner / defendant was accepted and it was to be executed by the Executing Court---High Court set-aside impugned judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts below---Revision filed by defendant, was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English