PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Irfan vs State Ss — 2025 MLD 1601 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 1601 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Irfan vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Irfan VS State Ss. 395 & 34---Dacoity, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Extra-judicial confession made by accused---Scope---Accused were charged for committing dacoity with the complainant and his cousin and snatching an amount of Rs. 30,00,000/- with a mobile---Appellant stated that on the day of occurrence, after consultation, he along with other accused came to Bank Islami, while one of the accused persons was present inside the bank---At about 12.30 p.m. two persons having a black colour bag came out of Bank and in the meantime the accused in the bank also came out of Bank and signaled them towards the witnesses---Hence, both the persons seated in an Alto Car and proceeded towards "S" Complex, while the accused persons also chased them and stopped the said vehicle of complainant party near Children Hospital and on gun point snatched Rs.30,00,000/- from them---Hence after looting the amount, the accused persons distributed the same amongst them and Rs.400,000/- had come towards his share, out of which he spent Rs.100,000/-, whereas the remaining amount as well as the share of accused were lying with him and he could recover the same---After recording disclosure of the appellant, he was taken to his house, where on the pointation of appellant from his residential room recovered Rs.740,000/----Appellant also pointed out the place of occurrence---For awarding conviction on the basis of extra-judicial confession, three-fold proof was required---Firstly, it was in fact made; secondly that it was voluntarily made; and thirdly that it was truly made---Extra-judicial confession indicated that all the ingredients were available in the case in hand, as the same was supported by attending circumstances---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English