PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Imran vs State S — 2025 MLD 291 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 291 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Imran vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Imran VS State S.497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.394, 397 & 337-F(ii)---Person voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery, dacoity with murder, qatl-i-amd, dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a decoity, common intention---Post arrest bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Accused was alleged to have retained stolen property in his possession, however the property in question was not recovered from the accused---Seven cellphones recovered from another person, which were allegedly received by him from the accused, were not the case property of the present case---Neither anything incriminating nor the cellphones allegedly robbed were secured from the accused---Recovered cellphones had no nexus or connectivity with the commission of the present offense---Mere foisting of articles or incriminating evidence is not sufficient to connect an individual with the crime unless specifically shown to have been involved---Prosecution had not recovered cellphones from either side along with SIMs through which it could be deduced that same were used by the accused while making conversation with each other, thus, if contents of investigation to the extent of CDR might be presumed to be true even then it required a lot of evidence which was yet to be adduced by the prosecution at the time of trial and the Trial Court had to determine its veracity---No sufficient evidence was found against the accused to connect him with the crime of retaining stolen property---Post-arrest bail was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English