PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Abdul Hameed Shah vs State Ss — 2025 MLD 797 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 797 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Abdul Hameed Shah vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Abdul Hameed Shah VS State Ss. 302(b), 324 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account proved---Accused was charged that he with rest of the culprits, in furtherance of their common intention, not only caused fire shot injuries to the sons of complainant but also caused danda blow to complainant with intention to commit their murder; and one son of the complainant died because of his injuries---Complainant in his FIR stated that on 28.04.2015 his two sons and his nephews were having scuffle with each other, he intervened to separate them; in the meanwhile appellant and co-accused took out their pistols; appellant fired at son of complainant which hit him on his right thigh while co-accused fired at other son of complainant which hit him on first finger of his right hand; then the brother of appellant arrived, who caused danda blow to him on his head; and finally the complainant and his sons were taken to hospital---Complainant and his sons were discharged after treatment while other injured was shifted to another hospital who died on 01.05.2014---Evidence of the complainant was silent with regard to causing him danda blow by co-accused---Except such omission, complainant had supported the narration made by him in his FIR to a large extent---Whatever was stated by injured got support from evidence of witness---Complainant and both of his witnesses had stood by their version on all material points and they could not be disbelieved only for the reason that they were related inter-se and/or there was no independent witness to the incident---Complainant and his witnesses indeed had no reason to involve the appellant in the case falsely who too was their close relative---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English