PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Bilal Muzaffar alias Heera vs State Ss — 2025 PCrLJ 942 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 942 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Bilal Muzaffar alias Heera vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Bilal Muzaffar alias Heera VS State Ss. 302(b), 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account not proved---Accused were charged for committing murder of the father of complainant and two others by firing---Prosecution produced two witnesses, to prove the ocular account---One of the witnesses was declared hostile---Complainant attributed a specific role in the written application and FIR to the appellant "WZ", who made a fire shot with his 222-bore rifle, which landed on the front of the abdomen of "GM"-deceased---Whereas in the postmortem examination report of "GM"-deceased, there was no firearm injury on the front of his abdomen---As per prosecution version given by the complainant in the written application and FIR, the appellant "WH", while armed with a 244-bore rifle, made a fire shot, which landed on the left side of the chest below the nipple of "AR", the deceased---Witness of ocular account had not attributed any injury to the appellant "WH", towards "AR", deceased---Specific roles were given to the co-accused, who were acquitted by the Court or with whom the legal heirs of the deceased compromised---No injury was attributed by witness to the appellant "WH", towards "AR"; instead, the injuries were attributed to his co-accused persons(since acquitted)---Hostile witness was cross-examined but it was found that he had denied all questions and suggestions put him during cross-examination and the prosecution had cross-examined said witness in detail---In the present case, one witness suppressed facts, and other was declared hostile---Despite the same, the Trial Court recorded findings holding the accused guilty of the offences charged---Such approach adopted by the Trial Court did not conform with the settled principles of burden of proof in criminal jurisprudence---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English