PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 PLD 279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case SAREM MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR vs SADIA AQUIL AHMED Ss — 2025 PLD 279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PLD 279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PLD
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 PLD 279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case SAREM MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR vs SADIA AQUIL AHMED Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 PLD 279 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case SAREM MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR VS SADIA AQUIL AHMED Ss. 8 & 19---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R.11---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Rejection of proceedings---Custody of minor---Ordinary place of residence of minor outside Pakistan---Jurisdiction of Court in Pakistan---Scope---Petitioner/father of minor assailed guardian proceedings before Guardian Court on the plea that ordinary place of residence of minor was abroad and not in Pakistan---Trial Court declined to reject the proceedings---Validity---At the time when dispute relating to custody of minor arose and guardian application was filed at Karachi by respondent/mother of minor, the home state/ordinary residence of minor was State of Washington, USA and not Karachi---Minor was not illegally or improperly removed or taken away from the custody of respondent at Karachi nor were the minor or parties residing or last resided at Karachi---Cause of action alleged by respondent/mother of minor had not arisen at Karachi---Guardian Court at Karachi did not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain application of respondent/ mother of minor seeking orders relating to custody of minor---High Court set aside order passed by Guardian Judge and application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C., filed by petitioner/father of minor was allowed---Minor could not be deprived of love, affection, care, presence and company of her father under any circumstances; and the respondent/ mother could not be the sole judge to decide when the minor should see or meet her father and grandparents and for how long or how frequently---Such right of petitioner/father and the minor, under Shariah and law in Pakistan, could not be denied or even curtailed---High Court settled schedule of meeting of petitioner/father with his daughter---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English