PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

SUBHA SADIQ vs State Ss — 2025 SCMR 50 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2025 SCMR 50 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2025
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
SUBHA SADIQ vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SUBHA SADIQ VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 353, 186 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), Ss. 7 & 21-L---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), art. 22---Murderous assault on police, acts of terrorism---Reappraisal of evidence---Test identification parade---Infirmities---In the present case the test identification proceedings were fraught with serious infirmities and, therefore, could not be relied upon for handing down the conviction---Proceedings were conducted and supervised by a Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, who had admitted in his testimony that the features of the petitioner and the eight dummies were not recorded in the report---It was unlikely that the two police officials who had arrived at the crime scene after the incident had taken place could have identified the accused who had fired at the deceased---None of the witnesses had attributed a specific role to the petitioner---In the facts and circumstances of the case it could not be ruled out that the witnesses of the test identification proceedings may have seen the petitioner after his arrest---It also appeared from the deposition of the Judicial Magistrate, who had supervised and conducted the test identification proceedings that he was not familiar with the guidelines and principles enunciated by the Supreme Court regarding the test identification proceedings---Probity and evidentiary value of the test identification proceedings were definitely questionable and, thus, could not have been relied upon for the purposes of handing down the conviction---Petition was converted into an appeal and allowed, the impugned judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the appellant was extended the benefit of doubt---Consequently, his conviction and sentence were set aside.

Other judgments reported in 2025 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English