Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali vs State Ss

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali VS State Ss. 324, 392, 397, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, robbery, robbery or dacoity with attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, using criminal force or assault on public servant while he was performing his duty, common intention, act of terrorism---appreciation of evidence---Ocular account corroborated by medical evidence---accused were charged for snatching motorcycle from the complainant; meanwhile four Police Officials arrived there on motorcycles, who signaled the accused to stop, but they opened fire on them with intention to kill them and deter them from discharging their duty causing firearm injury to a Police Constable; in retaliation one accused received bullet injuries and he fell down and was apprehended by the police---Injured Police Constable had corroborated the complainant by deposing that, on 21.11.2022, during patrolling at about 07.50 hours, they had seen four culprits committing robbery from two persons and on seeing police party they started firing, thereby encounter took place between police party and culprits and he received firearm injury on his left leg---Said witness had further deposed that the encounter continued for about 5-7 minutes and one culprit also sustained gunshot injuries, whereas three culprits made their escape good---Injured witness identified the appellant before the Trial Court---During cross-examination, evidence of injured witness remained unshaken---Medico-Legal Officer examined the injuries of Police Constable at Hospital and produced Medico Legal Certificate---as per Medical Certificate, no blacking was noticed near or around the wound and same was caused by a firearm---Oral and documentary evidence corroborated the version of complainant and injured---Investigating Officer pointing out that on 19.12.2022, he arrested the appellant, as he was already in custody in another criminal case, and on 26.12.2022 he got the identification test conducted through complainant before Judicial Magistrate concerned---Said witness had also deposed that the appellant was also involved in 4/5 other cases as per his CRO---In cross-examination, evidence of said witness remained unshaken on main points and false implication or enmity with the present appellant---appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Citation Name: 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mumtaz Ali vs State Ss — 2025 YLR 1424 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 YLR