PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Anwar vs State Ss — 2026 MLD 182 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 MLD 182 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Anwar vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 342

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Anwar VS State Ss. 265-F(7), 94, 540, 510 & 561-a---Constitution of Pakistan, art. 10-a---application seeking direction to Forensic DNa and Serology Laboratory for obtaining and matching a DNa profiling was dismissed---Held: It was an undisputed fact that the applicants did not submit such an application before the Investigating Officer during the investigation, nor did they approach the Judicial Magistrate supervising the investigation---Failure to raise such request at the proper procedural stage rendered the present application legally untenable---Record reflected that prosecution evidence had already concluded, statements of the accused under S.342, Cr.P.C., hadbeen recorded and the defense was now leading its evidence---Defense had a fair opportunity to challenge the DNa report through cross-examination but failed to do so---at this advanced stage, the request for further forensic examination was merely an attempt to reopen the investigation, which was impermissible under the law---Section 265-F(7),Cr.P.C., did not empower the Court to order a fresh investigation or conduct additional forensic testing---applicants' request for DNa profiling effectively sought to revive an aspect of the investigation, which fell outside the scope of said provision---Trial Court rightly held that what was not permissible directly could not be done indirectly---While exercising revisional jurisdiction, High Court must determine whether the trial Court committed a jurisdictional error or a manifest illegality---Trial Court had correctly applied the law and there was no illegality, irregularity, or miscarriage of justice in the impugned order---Petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English