Rao Omar Hashim Khan vs Ahmad Raza Maneka Ss — 2026 MLD 255 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Rao Omar Hashim Khan VS Ahmad Raza Maneka Ss. 142, 144(2)(a) & 145 (1)---Election Rules, 2017, R.145---Election petition---Presentation---Word "complete"---Scope---Applicant / returned candidate sought dismissal of petition on the ground that it was non-compliant with mandatory provisions of Ss.142(2)(a) & 144(2) of Elections Act, 2017 wherein complete list of witnesses had not been annexed---Validity---Term 'complete' must be construed in a practical and purposive manner---Petitioner provided names of all witnesses, private as well as official---Even if affidavits of some of the witnesses were missing or particulars in respect of few others contained clerical errors, overall compliance was substantial---Law did not prescribe automatic rejection of election petition for such lapses inasmuch as the petitioner could elect not to rely on any of the listed witnesses whether his affidavit was available or not---List of witnesses and their respective affidavits were duly annexed with the petition---Witnesses were individually named and their affidavits clearly disclosed nature and scope of their proposed deposition---Any minor typographic discrepancy, such as inconsistency in parentage of witnesses or CNICs, could not obstruct identification of witnesses or understanding of their proposed evidence---Official witnesses were named, along with clear reference to the polling stations where irregularities occurred in the main petition---This had constituted sufficient justification for the purposes of R.145 or Election Rules, 2017, which was procedural and had not been listed under S.145(1) of Elections Act, 2017 as one of the provisions, breach whereof would result in summary rejection of petition---Purpose of R.145 (1) of Elections Rules, 2017 was to control irrelevant summoning of official witnesses and not to bar the petition itself---Election Tribunal held that election petition was competently presented under S.142 of Elections Act, 2017 and list of witnesses substantially satisfied S.144(2)(a) of Elections Act, 2017---Reference to official witnesses fulfilled requirement of R.145 of Election Rules, 2017 and if any objection was to be pressed to the extent of summoning of official witnesses that could be decided when stage of summoning of said witnesses would reach---Application was dismissed, in circumstances.

Rao Omar Hashim Khan vs Ahmad Raza Maneka Ss — 2026 MLD 255 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD